Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 891: 164402, 2023 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2327896

ABSTRACT

Over four thousand portable air cleaners (PACs) with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters were distributed by Public Health - Seattle & King County to homeless shelters during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of these HEPA PACs in reducing indoor particles and understand the factors that affect their use in homeless shelters. Four rooms across three homeless shelters with varying geographic locations and operating conditions were enrolled in this study. At each shelter, multiple PACs were deployed based on the room volume and PAC's clean air delivery rate rating. The energy consumption of these PACs was measured using energy data loggers at 1-min intervals to allow tracking of their use and fan speed for three two-week sampling rounds, separated by single-week gaps, between February and April 2022. Total optical particle number concentration (OPNC) was measured at 2-min intervals at multiple indoor locations and an outdoor ambient location. The empirical indoor and outdoor total OPNC were compared for each site. Additionally, linear mixed-effects regression models (LMERs) were used to assess the relationship between PAC use time and indoor/outdoor total OPNC ratios (I/OOPNC). Based on the LMER models, a 10 % increase in the hourly, daily, and total time PACs were used significantly reduced I/OOPNC by 0.034 [95 % CI: 0.028, 0.040; p < 0.001], 0.051 [95 % CI: 0.020, 0.078; p < 0.001], and 0.252 [95 % CI: 0.150, 0.328; p < 0.001], respectively, indicating that keeping PACs on resulted in significantly lower I/OOPNC. The survey suggested that keeping PACs on and running was the main challenge when operating them in shelters. These findings suggested that HEPA PACs were an effective short-term strategy to reduce indoor particle levels in community congregate living settings during non-wildfire seasons and the need for formulating practical guidance for using them in such an environment.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution, Indoor , COVID-19 , Humans , Particulate Matter/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Washington , Pandemics , COVID-19/prevention & control , Dust , Air Pollutants/analysis
2.
Applied Sciences ; 12(18):9360, 2022.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-2032834

ABSTRACT

During the COVID-19 pandemic, reusable masks became ubiquitous;these masks were made from various fabrics without guidance from the research community or regulating agencies. Though reusable masks reduce the waste stream associated with disposable masks and promote the use of masks by the population, their efficacy in preventing the transmission of infectious agents has not been evaluated sufficiently. Among the unknowns is the effect of relative humidity (RH) on fabrics' filtration efficiency (FE) and breathability. This study evaluates the FE and breathability of several readily accessible mask materials in an aerosol chamber. Sodium chloride aerosols were used as the challenge aerosol with aerodynamic particle diameter in the 0.5 to 2.5 µm range. To mimic the variability in RH in the environment and the exhaled-breath condition, the chamber was operated at RH of 30% to 70%. The face velocity was varied between 0.05 m/s and 0.19 m/s to simulate different breathing rates. The FE and pressure drop were used to determine the quality factor of the materials. Among the tested materials, the 3M P100 filter has the highest pressure drop of 140 Pa;the N95 mask and the 3M P100 have almost 100% FE for all sizes of particles and tested face velocities;the surgical mask has nearly 90% FE for all the particles and the lowest pressure drop among the certified materials, which ranks it the second to the N95 mask in the quality factor. Other material performance data are presented as a function of relative humidity and aerosol size. The quality factor for each material was compared against reference filtration media and surgical masks. Multiple layers of selected materials are also tested. While the additional layers improve FE, the pressure drop increases linearly. Additionally, the certified materials performed approximately three times better than the highest performing non-certified material.

3.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 10(6)2022 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1911285

ABSTRACT

As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, infection with the Omicron variants has become a serious risk to global public health. Anesthesia providers are often called upon for endotracheal intubations for COVID patients. Expedite and safe intubation can save patient's life, while minimizing the virus exposure to the anesthesia provider and personnel involved during airway intervention is very important to protect healthcare workers and conserve the medical work force. In this paper, we share clinical experience of using a video-assisted intubating stylet technique combined with a simple plastic sheet barrier placed over the patients' mouth for tracheal intubation during the Omicron crisis in Taiwan. We demonstrated that the use of an intubating stylet combined with plastic sheet barrier is swift, safe, and accurate in securing the airway in patients with COVID-19.

4.
BMC Complement Med Ther ; 21(1): 70, 2021 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1090677

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Large-scale epidemics have changed people's medical behavior, and patients tend to delay non-urgent medical needs. However, the impact of the pandemic on the use of complementary and alternative medicine remains unknown. METHODS: This retrospective study aimed to analyze the changes in the number of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) patients and examine the epidemic prevention policy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We analyzed the number of TCM patients in Taipei City Hospital from January 2017 to May 2020. We tallied the numbers of patients in each month and compared them with those in the same months last year. We calculated the percentage difference in the number of patients to reveal the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TCM utilization. We used the Mann-Whitney U test to examine whether there was a significant difference in the number of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: We included a total of 1,935,827 TCM visits of patients from January 2017 to May 2020 in this study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients decreased significantly, except in February 2020. The number of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic had fallen by more than 15% compared with those in the same months last year. March and April had the greatest number of patient losses, with falls of 32.8 and 40% respectively. TCM patients declined significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and mobile medicine provided to rural areas fell considerably. Among all the TCM specialties, pediatrics and traumatology, as well as infertility treatment, witnessed the most significant decline in the number of patients. However, the number of cancer patients has reportedly increased. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic decreased the utilization rate of TCM, especially for mobile healthcare in rural areas. We suggest that the government pay attention to the medical disparity between urban and rural areas, which are affected by the pandemic, as well as allocate adequate resources in areas deprived of medical care.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Taiwan/epidemiology
5.
Cell Transplant ; 30: 963689720987527, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1021285

ABSTRACT

Since its outbreak in China, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused worldwide disaster. Globally, there have been 71,581,532 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 1,618,374 deaths, reported to World Health Organization (data retrieved on December 16, 2020). Currently, no treatment modalities for COVID-19 (e.g., vaccines or antiviral drugs) with confirmed efficacy and safety are available. Although the possibilities and relevant challenges of some alternatives (e.g., use of stem cells as immunomodulators) have been proposed, the personal protective equipment is still the only way to protect and lower infection rates of COVID-19 among healthcare workers and airway managers (intubators). In this article, we described the combined use of a plastic sheet as a barrier with the intubating stylet for tracheal intubation in patients needing mechanical ventilation. Although conventional or video-assisted laryngoscopy is more popular and familiar to other groups around the world, we believe that the video-assisted intubating stylet technique is much easier to learn and master. Advantages of the video stylet include the creation of greater working distance between intubator and patient, less airway stimulation, and less pharyngeal space needed for endotracheal tube advancement. All the above features make this technique reliable and superior to other devices, especially when a difficult airway is encountered in COVID scenario. Meanwhile, we proposed the use of a flexible and transparent plastic sheet to serve as a barrier against aerosol and droplet spread during airway management. We demonstrated that the use of a plastic sheet would not interfere or hinder the intubator's maneuvers during endotracheal intubation. Moreover, we demonstrated that the plastic sheet was effective in preventing the spread of mist and water spray in simulation models with a mannequin. In our experience, we found that this technique most effectively protected the intubator and other operating room personnel from infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Personal Protective Equipment , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Physical Distancing , Plastics/chemistry , Taiwan/epidemiology , Video Recording/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL